Letter from Jon Wilson

WILSON LAW C ENT ER L L C Jonathan O. Wilson, Attorney at Law P.O. Box 1102 Morrison, Colorado 80465 Fax: (303) 697-1189 jon.wilson.law@hotmail.com April 9, 2008 Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance P.O. Box 9022 Cincinnati, Ohio 45209 Re: Letter explaining factual and legal background to medical providers Dear Sir or Madam: This law firm represents Freedom from Covert Harassment and Surveillance (“Freedom”), an organization with several hundred members around the country and internationally who have reason to believe they are targeted with various non-lethal weapons. Freedom is currently communicating with legislators in order to institute hearings and investigations of the numerous abuses of citizens. The purpose of this letter is to inform medical providers of the factual and legal background behind many complaints of physical and psychological symptoms that patients relate to non-lethal weapons. It has come to our attention that medical providers often dismiss these allegations as unrealistic and false and attribute them to mental instability. It is difficult to legally prove targeting by psychotronic weapons when the perpetrators operate from remote, unseen locations and therefore the targeting can be dismissed as delusional. Given the wide scope of alleged targeting, there is a certain risk of sounding too conspiratorial, however, common denominators exist, such as similar physical and psychological claims, surveillance scenarios, and harassment techniques. We strongly urge you to not summarily dismiss a patient’s claims of being targeted with nonlethal, directed energy weapons for the following reasons: 1. Evidence supports the conclusion that weapons exist that could be used against individuals, based on U.S. Patent and Trademark Office filings, public releases by agencies, and other technologies that indicate the level of technological sophistication. The weapons are believed to be based on electromagnetism, microwaves, sonic waves, lasers and other types of directed energy, and were characterized as “psychotronic” in Rep. Dennis Kucinich’s draft of House Resolution 2977, the Space Preservation Act of 2001. 2. Furthermore, it is undeniable that government agencies have tested citizens without permission in the past; for example, the CIA’s human experimentation discussed in Orlikow v. U.S., 682 F.Supp. 77 (D.D.C. 1988), secretly administered lysergic acid diethylamide discussed in United States v. Stanley, 483 U.S. 669 (1987), and military chemical experimentation as discussed in Congressional Committee Report 103-97, 103d Congress, 2d Session, S. Prt. 103-97 (Dec. 8, 1994). 3. Lastly, the sheer numbers of people complaining of being targeted, including people with post-graduate degrees and a lifetime of achievements, and the similarities in symptoms, tend to outweigh a dismissive response based on charges of anecdotal evidence or group paranoia. Therefore, we urge you to at least consider the possibility of symptoms resulting from radiation, electromagnetism, sonic energy, other unusual types of energy, as well as psychological symptoms resulting from intentional harassment.